The Federal Reserve was successfully able to remove the term "patience" from its post meeting statement last week and, at the same time, eased market fears of an impatient Fed. The week or so leading up to the Fed meeting had seen increased calls for the Fed to be slow in raising interest rates, from Ray Dalio at Bridgewater to Jeff Gundlach at DoubleLine. I am in agreement that the Fed should be very deliberate about when and how much it raises rates. The downside risks from too much tightening far exceed the risk from being slow.
The Fed was successful in achieving its goal of maximum flexibility while still removing "patience" because of two key factors. First, by stating that employment has room to improve from its current level. Second, by reducing its forward expectation of the Fed Funds rate in the "dot plot" from 1.125% at year end to 0.625%. As a result, the market has interpreted the Fed as being more dovish, leading to the decline in interest rates, increase in the stock market, and depreciation of the U.S. Dollar that we have seen since the meeting ended.
So where do we go from here? I expect the markets will be very data-dependent for the next few months, with large day-to-day or week-to-week volatility. It is difficult to create "alpha" in this type of short-term, choppy trading action because no clear trend exists. In this environment, it is difficult to reposition a portfolio to take advantage of these short-term opportunities. Additionally, low liquidity in most markets makes it costly to execute large trades and even costlier to reverse those trades if it becomes necessary, given the swiftness of market moves. With that said, opportunities do exist to generate solid returns, and pockets of long-term value still can be found.
On the fixed income side, while we have been placing less emphasis on high yield corporates and agency residential real estate-backed bonds, we continue to see value in Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) and multifamily housing backed bonds. If you haven't read last week’s Chart of the Week by Mark Heppenstall, take a look, as it explains why residential mortgages are overvalued.
This blog post is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, Dave O’Malley, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.
Any statements about financial and company performance of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company or its insurance subsidiaries (each, “Client”) made by the author is provided with a written consent from the Client. Penn Mutual Asset Management is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company.
Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ significantly. Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.
High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.