NASDAQ Reaches All-Time High as the S&P500 Index Breaks Out of its Short-Term Trading

April 27, 2015

NASDAQ Reaches All-Time High as the S&P500 Index Breaks Out of its Short-Term Trading Photo

Better-than-expected corporate earnings and mixed economic news allowed stocks to move higher during the past weeks. It took 15 years, but the NASDAQ finally made a new all-time high last week. The Index looks very different than it did 15 years ago and is much more reasonably valued, but a lot has changed in the world during that time. In 2000, the Price/Earnings (PE) ratio was 194 versus a ratio of 21 today. But what else was going on in 2000?

Fifteen years ago, America Online (AOL) and Time Warner merged, and companies like Facebook and Twitter didn't exist. The 10-year Treasury yielded 6.39% versus 1.94% today, and the price of gold was $288.60 when it now sits at $1,194.40 per ounce. When the NASDAQ made its high in March of 2000, the Apple iPod was more than a year away from being introduced. Today, Apple is the highest-valued company in the world and the largest component of the NASDAQ.

This week, when we see more economic data, along with the Fed meeting on Wednesday, we'll hopefully get some clues on the economy's performance. The key economic indicators for the week should be Consumer Confidence, first quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Employment Cost Index and the ISM Manufacturing Index. Market participants will be looking for information to determine if the economy is picking up steam in the second quarter.

The breakout of the range for the S&P 500 Index could add some carry-through momentum this week. Bonds remain range-bound and will be looking for more direction from the Fed. I expect market participants to continue to discuss the implications and valuation of the $3 trillion in global debt that has negative yields.

Tags: Monday Morning O'Malley | S&P 500 | Negative yields | NASDAQ | All-time high | Price/Earnings ratio | Breakout

< Go to Monday Morning O'Malley

This blog post is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, Dave O’Malley, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Any statements about financial and company performance of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company or its insurance subsidiaries (each, “Client”) made by the author is provided with a written consent from the Client.  Penn Mutual Asset Management is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications