The Fed: "Hawkish," "Dovish," or Both?

March 2, 2015

The Fed:

Last week's congressional testimony from Federal Reserve Chairperson Janet Yellen has led to a debate among market participants about whether her comments were "hawkish" or "dovish" and when interest rates will rise. My take on the testimony is that the Fed is trying to be both hawkish and dovish at the same time in order to create the most flexibility for future policy action. Given the level of growth and inflation, having this flexibility going forward will be important. With current global economic and geopolitical events, the Fed must be data- and event-dependent as it looks to reduce monetary accommodation. Yellen also spent time during her testimony to prepare the market for the removal of the "patience" language from the Fed minutes, saying that a rate hike two meetings after the removal was not a given. This flexibility will likely lead to increased volatility in the markets in the short term as each data point will be analyzed and interpreted closely.

Last week's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) report reduced the preliminary estimate of fourth quarter growth from 2.6% to 2.2%. While overall growth was revised lower, last quarter's consumer spending report climbed by the most in four years, which continues to support the strength of the economic expansion.

I was asked last week to provide some additional detail around why we expect a strong dollar and oil prices to remain in a range of roughly $40 to $60. With regard to oil, we believe that we currently have significant supply/demand imbalances today, which have driven prices lower. This imbalance is due to an excess supply and not a decrease in demand. We believe the supply imbalance will moderate in the next 12 to 18 months due to the drop in capital spending and the more rapid reduction in oil well productivity for wells that are using fracking methods.

We believe the U.S. dollar will be well-bid because the rest of the world is trying to stimulate growth, either by lowering interest rates or through quantitative easing. This comes at the same time that the Fed may increase interest rates, making the U.S. dollar more attractive on both an absolute and relative value basis. The world is actually short dollars because of the roughly $4 trillion of debt issued in dollars by non-U.S. entities. The current strength of the U.S. dollar adds additional pressure to cover some of this exposure, which requires buying U.S. dollars.

Tags: Monday Morning O'Malley | Oil | Federal Reserve | U.S. Dollar | GDP | Janet Yellen

< Go to Monday Morning Perspectives

This blog post is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Any statements about financial and company performance of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company or its insurance subsidiaries (each, “Client”) made by the author is provided with a written consent from the Client.  Penn Mutual Asset Management is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications