Preferred/Hybrid Issuance Jumps in Midstream Sector

January 11, 2018

Preferred/Hybrid Issuance Jumps in Midstream Sector Photo

Junior subordinated hybrid debt and perpetual preferred stock issuance jumped meaningfully for midstream issuers in the second half of 2017, as this week’s chart demonstrates. The midstream sector, dominated by master limited partnership (MLP) structures, commonly generates significant amounts of negative free cash flow, as the majority of operating cash flows are distributed to shareholders and capital spending is funded externally. While issuers have reigned in capital expenditure (capex), sold non-core assets, or cut distributions to alleviate some stress on cash flow, the sector continues to rely on external capital.

Issuers have shown preference for accessing this capital in the form of hybrids or perpetual preferreds as MLP equities have been poor performers. As you can also see in this week’s chart, the S&P MLP Index (SPMLP) finished 2017 with a negative 12% return, a significant underperformer relative to the broader market (S&P 500 Index up approximately 21%). As a result, raising capital in the equity market is very unattractive. Raising debt is also not a desirable alternative with sector leverage already at elevated levels.

Junior subordinated hybrid and perpetual preferred structures receive partial equity treatment from rating agencies, making them a much more cost efficient option. Depending on the particular issues, the rating agencies generally give more equity treatment for structures that are deemed as a more permanent source of capital. Those that are perpetual, have very long dated final maturities, or have coupon steps that are not exorbitant to incentivize an early redemption are considered more equity-like. For investment grade issuers of senior unsecured paper, hybrids or preferred issuance from these entities will generally be attributed 25% to 50% equity treatment by the rating agencies. Therefore, as long as yields remain low and investor demand remains, along with an unattractive equity option, hybrid and preferred issuance will continue.

S&P hasn’t committed to a hard limit on the amounts of hybrids a company can issue that will be assigned equity credit. However, they indicated that 15% of capitalization seems to be a reasonable threshold, as beyond a certain point a “company’s nonstandard, complex, or over-engineered balance sheet begins to put its financial policies in a negative light.” Moody’s caps issuance at 30% of total equity.

Key Takeaway

At the end of 2017, the hybrid and preferred midstream space had experienced pricing pressure as investors braced for more supply from issuers to address capital needs and some large M&A-driven deals. While the potential additional supply may weigh on performance in the short term, these instruments in select credits offer compelling long-term value in a continued low interest rate environment. From a bondholder perspective, hybrid structures with high back-end coupon steps and/or non-perpetual can be attractive holdings given the spread pick-up relative to senior unsecured paper.

Tags: Chart of the Week | M&A | Master limited partnership | Hybrid debt | Perpetual preferred

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications