After the financial crisis, consumer and mortgage credit contracted sharply as lenders and regulators grappled with the new credit landscape. Regulators sought ways to curb underwriting slippage to prevent future bubbles from forming. The natural byproduct of this increased regulation and added scrutiny was for underwriting standards to become so stringent that many borrowers no longer qualified for mortgage and automobile loans, which were more easily accessible before the crisis.
Seven years later, mortgage credit underwriting standards remain very tight, but consumer credit for autos and credit cards has loosened materially. The lenders are of course aware of the added risk associated with expanding the credit box, and they have the ability to charge higher interest rates in order to offset those associated risks. However, historical delinquencies and losses in subprime auto lending for more recent vintages suggest that underwriting has slipped to a point where the risk profile of the sector is starting to deteriorate.
Key Takeaway: In spite of the strong technicals present in the credit markets, increasing subprime automobile loan delinquencies are a cause for concern. As subprime credit lending standards have eased, sector performance has started showing signs of weakness. Securitized credit backed by autos has long been considered a cash surrogate due to the outstanding liquidity and deal structures in the sector. However, the recent weakness in sector performance should cause credit investors to think a little more deeply regarding underwriting quality as they choose how to be involved in the sector.
The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.
This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management. This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.
Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ significantly. Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.
High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.