The Strength of Fixed-Rate CLOs

May 21, 2020

Sources: Intex, Bloomberg Sources: Intex, Bloomberg

While the vast majority of collateralized loan obligation (CLO) issuance is in floating-rate format and benchmarked to 3-Month LIBOR, this week’s chart highlights the relatively small portion of the market that is issued in fixed-rate format. CLO managers tend to be reluctant to offer fixed-rate tranches. The underlying collateral (leveraged loans) is floating rate, so offering fixed-rate tranches typically requires the use of a swap, which can be costly and not economically sensible for the CLO manager or equity holder. Due to these challenging economics, fixed-rate tranches tend not to be created unless the issuer is pressured to do so. This pressure can take the form of weaker investor demand for CLOs generally. Also, CLO managers that have weaker sponsorship for their deals might be more likely to issue fixed-rate tranches to attract more investors. Furthermore, as this week’s chart highlights, fixed-rate tranche creation tends to be most popular with the AA class, suggesting that of all the classes in the capital stack, the AA class may have the weakest support from investors. 

Offering fixed-rate CLOs as a way to increase investor demand for a tranche tends to be successful due to the attractive characteristics of the structure. While it is common knowledge that fixed-rate securities will outperform floating-rate securities during periods of declining interest rates, this week’s commentary seeks to dig a little deeper into the value of fixed-rate CLOs. Some investor types, particularly insurance companies, place value on the stability of cash flows since they may be matching cash inflows from securities to cash outflows for their liabilities. Floating-rate securities tend to be weaker in this area due to the volatility of the underlying benchmark for CLO securities. As an example of this volatility, 3-Month LIBOR started the year at 1.91% and, at the time of writing this article, has since fallen to a level of 43 basis points.   

Fixed-rate CLOs also tend to offer dollar price protection during times of market stress. The deep discount floating-rate opportunities currently offered in the market can provide attractive convexity to investors. However, some investors prefer high-carry opportunities, such as what fixed-rate CLO can offer. Scarcity value also offers a strong support to fixed-rate CLO prices. As seen in this week’s chart, fixed-rate issuance for any given rating category is typically in the low single digits as a percentage of the total market. With supply this limited, investors interested in the fixed-rate CLO trade are likely to pay attention and firmly support it when fixed-rate CLOs are offered in the primary and secondary markets. 

Key Takeaway

The conditions leading to the issuance of fixed-rate CLOs include the strength of the CLO market, CLO manager tiering and investor sponsorship for a given rated class at the time of issuance. Fixed-rate CLOs offer more stable cash flows due to recent volatility in the 3-Month LIBOR Index. Fixed-rate CLOs also offer dollar price protection during times of market distress, due to scarcity value and outstanding carry amid low-interest-rate market environments. 

 

 

Tags: fixed-rate CLOs | CLO managers | cash flow | Market volatility | Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO)

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications