Idiosyncratic Risk in Leveraged Loans vs. High-Yield Corporate Bonds

September 3, 2015

Idiosyncratic Risk in Leveraged Loans vs. High-Yield Corporate Bonds Photo

Crude oil continues to lick its wounds which started in June of last year. Analysts are expecting continued pain in the oil and gas sector, and the metals and mining sector has joined the ranks of distressed sectors. A popular high-yield corporate bond ETF – the iShares iBoxx HYG ETF (HYG) – has seen a somewhat steady decline since the June 2014 inception of the slide in crude oil, with the exception of a temporary recovery starting in mid-December 2014. Leveraged loan prices, as measured by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, started sliding with oil as well, but hit resistance at the 95 price level in mid-December 2014. This resistance level for leveraged loans was tested and held for a second time last week. While HYG has now managed to break through its resistance price level of 87 back in mid-December 2014, we have reason to believe leveraged loans should fare better if the weakness in commodity prices continues.

An analysis of the constituents of HYG yields an exposure of 16.3% on a market value basis to the oil and gas and metals and mining sectors. The HYG exposure is outsized compared to the leveraged loan universe average combined exposure of 5.90% (3.55% oil and gas and 2.35% metals and mining). The notable difference in idiosyncratic risk between leveraged loans and high-yield corporate bonds has been recognized by the market and is reflected in the decoupling of the leveraged loan index from HYG starting in February, as can be seen in this week’s chart.

Key Takeaway: As the higher exposure to idiosyncratic risk continues to weigh down on HYG, leveraged loans could be poised for a rebound and demonstrate stronger resilience due to better sector diversification. This resilience in leveraged loans is a positive for the leveraged loan and collateralized loan obligation (CLO) markets and will continue to contain the fallout associated with the oil and gas and metals and mining sectors.

Tags: Chart of the Week | Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO) | High-Yield Corporate Bonds | Leveraged Loans | Crude Oil

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications