What’s the Potential for Outperformance in Crossover Credits?

November 16, 2017

What’s the Potential for Outperformance in Crossover Credits? Photo

As the cycle progresses further into its late stages, upward rating migration may continue due to improving fundamentals, operational enhancements, and active balance sheet repair. After spending a good portion of the past year repairing their balance sheets through asset sales and debt pay downs, energy companies have been the prime beneficiaries of positive rating actions in 2017. According to Barclays, of the credits that have seen upgrades into investment grade year to date, a full 60% of the volumes have occurred in the energy sector. Credits outside the commodity related sectors have only represented 30% of total volumes and those were largely driven by credit specific factors.

This past year has seen the volumes of names dropping to non-investment grade at decade lows. This followed 2016, which was the fourth largest year out of the last 20 years for credit volumes falling into the high yield index. However, expectation of further credit upgrade volumes in the coming year does not mean credit downgrades will be low. For example, consumer leveraged issuers (i.e. retailers) and select pharmaceutical names are likely to be vulnerable to ratings pressure in the coming year.

Identifying ratings migration patterns can provide a path to outperformance in the months leading up to a ratings event. Credits trending to high yield ratings generally underperform in the months prior to a ratings cut and outperform following the transfer to high yield. In contrast, credits progressing to investment grade have been shown to outperform in the months prior to a ratings upgrade. However, todays chart highlights how the capacity of further outperformance of credits migrating to investment grade is constrained. The Bloomberg Barclays Corporate Crossover Index option adjusted spread (OAS) has compressed to the BBB Corporate Index OAS to a basis not experienced since the financial crisis. The OAS differential was at its long-term tights in 2005. The tight trading levels and global reach for yield have fed the spread compression and leaves less room for credit rating upgrade driven performance.

Key Takeaway:

There are names and sectors on which to be constructive given the deleveraging stories and stabilizing cash flow generation. The outlook for ratings upgrades to investment grade is expected to be at levels similar to the current year. As a result of price stability in global commodities and actions taken to rightsize balance sheets, metals and mining names will likely highlight rating upgrades along with some energy credits. However, room for outperformance in crossover names has become limited by narrow trading levels. Outperformance now more than ever may largely be as much a function of avoiding deteriorating credits as it is identifying credit upgrade stories.


Tags: Chart of the Week | Credit cycle | High yield | Corporate crossover | Outperformance | Crossover credits

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications