Alternative Assets – The Numbers Don’t Lie

December 22, 2022

Source: JPMorgan Source: JPMorgan

Over time, there have been considerable changes in the makeup of institutional investment portfolios as those institutions have moved beyond typical stock and bond portfolios and introduced alternative assets such as private equity, venture capital, private credit and hedge funds. The reality is that traditional stock and bond portfolios no longer allow institutions to meet their investment return targets. As the chart above illustrates,  active long-only U.S. equity and bond funds are more likely to have tight return distributions than alternative asset strategies, and as a result, a traditional stock and bond investment portfolio is likely to result in performance that falls short of expectations, even if the portfolio consists solely of top-quartile performers. Additionally, while investing in alternative assets can increase returns, it also increases the range of potential outcomes (there are no guarantees that taking more risk automatically increases returns).

There are many reasons for the difference in return distributions between traditional and alternative assets, but perhaps the biggest is that traditional stock or bond funds often manage to passive, investible benchmarks. Because most long-only managers do not wish to underperform their benchmarks, their after-fee performance tends to closely track that of their benchmarks, and thus their relative performance versus their peer group. Conversely, the universe of private companies is much larger than the universe of public companies, and because passive indexes that track the performance of a portfolio of private companies are not feasible, they tend to have much greater dispersion than their liquid investment strategy brethren.

What that means for investors who wish to invest in alternative assets, especially those who do not try to time when to commit to certain strategies, is that manager selection is the factor that determines the ultimate performance outcome within this part of the portfolio. In these strategies, if you’re able to consistently choose top quartile private money managers, you can earn pretty nice returns on your capital. If you get it wrong, however, performance is much more pedestrian – and can lag the performance of active long-only equity and bond funds.

Unfortunately, the solution is not easy. The effort involved in evaluating an alternative investment opportunity is significant and requires a different set of analytical tools versus what is required to analyze a traditional investment opportunity. Comprehensive diligence is particularly critical for alternative assets, where the spread between the best and worst-performing managers is substantially wider than in other asset classes, making manager selection a paramount issue. Further, because many managers and/or strategies need to limit the amount of capital in order to continue to generate outsized returns, access to the best managers is often limited. 


Key Takeaway

David Swensen, former CIO of the Yale Endowment summed it up best in his 2012 endowment update: “Selecting top managers in private markets leads to much greater reward than identifying top managers in public markets. On the other hand, poor private manager selection can lead to extremely disappointing results as a consequence of high fees, poor performance, and illiquid positions.”1  When it comes to alternative investing, barring tactical commitments, manager selection is the most impactful tool in an allocator’s toolbox. Strong due diligence and access to the best managers can result in thousands of basis points of outperformance versus category averages. Nothing is a given, but take the time, put in the effort, and build relationships with strong general partners, and you should increase your chances of producing strong portfolio returns. Enjoy the holiday season and have a safe and healthy new year! 



1Source: Yale Endowment: 2012 The Yale Endowment; 9/27/12

Tags: private markets | alternative assets | Institutional investors | alternative asset managers

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications