Drilling A Bit Deeper into High Yield Energy

November 2, 2017

Drilling A Bit Deeper into High Yield Energy Photo

With the energy markets seemingly rebalanced and oil prices hovering near $55 per barrel, we have decided to take a closer look at the Oil Field Services sector. This subsector is the weakest link in the energy supply chain as these companies largely rely on exploration and drilling capital expenditures.  It was the most distressed energy subsector in 2016 and has been the last to recover.  Still, enough has transpired to suggest a potential inflection point in fundamentals in 2018 or 2019, with many of the survivors effectively extending their own runways via opportunistic refinancings.  Despite the spread compression in 2017, as seen in this week’s chart, this subsector of High Yield Energy still has higher credit spreads than the overall High Yield Energy sector and therefore is worth drilling into further (pun intended).

The companies that make up the Oil Field Services subsector, as the name implies, provide services to the oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) companies, but do not produce the commodities themselves. This subsector also includes the drillers for offshore and onshore energy production. While these service companies do not have direct commodity price risk, they are actually some of the most levered businesses to the underlying commodity price.

The service companies are the most levered because they require E&P companies to explore for new barrels of gas and oil. In that sense service companies do not control their own destiny. On their behalf, E&P companies will only drill for more oil and gas when prices justifies the action, and so when commodity prices fall their services are the first to get cut.  Prices for their services contract sharply, backlogs shrivel, and equipment idles. Within the oil services sector, the offshore drillers face additional challenges in contrast to previous energy cycles, as the ability for E&P companies to produce shale oil has dramatically changed the oil supply situation over the last couple of years. The cost of a barrel of oil from offshore drillers is on the high end of the oil supply cost curve due to cheap onshore shale oil.

At sub $50 per barrel WTI oil, the demand for energy services, especially offshore drillers, is certainly at risk. However, at $50 per barrel many of these companies have been able to access the High Yield Market, albeit at high coupons due to their elevated risk and extension of near term maturities. The terming out of their debt preserves their optionality through the cycle and buys them time for better supply/demand fundamentals to emerge.

Key Takeaway:

In a world where spreads are 400 basis points (bps) in High Yield, an additional 142 bps or 35% pickup can make all the difference. This is especially true in a coupon-clipping year, which is what many high yield strategists often predict at the outset for the coming year. Is it worthwhile taking the additional risk in the Oil Field Services subsector now that we are approaching $55 WTI oil? I would say offshore drillers and energy services have longer runways this time and would be a good place to invest.

Tags: Chart of the Week | Oil | Energy | Oil Field Services | High yield energy | Energy production | Energy cycles

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications